l Message-
> >From: R-help [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Naike
> Wang
> >Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 08:32
> >To: R-help@r-project.org
> >Subject: [R] Classic fail-safe N
> >
> >Hi all,
> >I was conducting a meta-analysis of si
, June 26, 2017 08:32
>To: R-help@r-project.org
>Subject: [R] Classic fail-safe N
>
>Hi all,
>I was conducting a meta-analysis of single proportions(i.e. without a
>control group) using the metafor package. When I performed a classic
>fail-safe N, I noticed that the result (the
Hi all,
I was conducting a meta-analysis of single proportions(i.e. without a
control group) using the metafor package. When I performed a classic
fail-safe N, I noticed that the result (the number of missing studies that
would bring p-value to the alpha, to be exact)was different than that I got
i
Hi all,
I was conducting a meta-analysis of single proportions(i.e. without a
control group) using the metafor package. When I performed a classic
fail-safe N, I noticed that the result (the number of missing studies that
would bring p-value to the alpha, to be exact)was different than that I got
i
4 matches
Mail list logo
