On Apr 3, 2015, at 5:09 AM, Wing Keong Lew wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it a requirement to provide the break intervals of the cut function in
> ascending order?
Apparently not. I get teh sam splits even with random permutations. It is
apparently a "requirement" to make sure you labels match the sorte
Hi,
Is it a requirement to provide the break intervals of the cut function in
ascending order? The help documentation for cut didn't specify this but the
labels returned are reversed if I indicate the break intervals in a descending
order. Here is an example
tbl<-data.frame(x=c(0:10))
tbl$asce
2 matches
Mail list logo