Include the levels argument in your calls to factor so the tables
all have the same dimensions.
> table(factor((1:4)>2), factor( (1:4)>0 ))
TRUE
FALSE2
TRUE 2
> table(factor((1:4)>2, levels=c(FALSE,TRUE)), factor( (1:4)>0,
levels=c(FALSE,TRUE) ))
FALSE TRUE
FALSE
You don't provide a reproducible example - what does your data look like?
If this were my problem, I would start by working through the function
step by step with one of my files
data <- filelist[[1]]
dataodd <- data[-(1:18),]
and so on, examining the result at every step with tools like dim() a
Dear R-team,
I have written this code for calculation my data file. But there shows
'subscript out of bounds’.
> computeResponse <- function(data){
+ dataodd <- data[-(1:18),]
+ dataodd <- dataodd[seq(1,nrow(dataodd), 2),]
+ hitsodd <- table(factor(dataodd[,5]), factor(dataodd[,15]
Hi,
i have a function like this,
*GetCsv[GetCsv[,ColHdr]ArrMinMax[iCol,2],ColHdr_QF]<-"RC"*
Here,
*GetCsv* -- It contain a matrix
*ColHdr* -- Is a column Header
*ArrMinMax* - It is a array of 2 columns
-
Here, this is the function to change
Thank you very much David. I should realize myslef that operator precedence
cause the problem. Sorry about this:-) I solved the problem.
--- On Tue, 3/13/12, David Winsemius wrote:
From: David Winsemius
Subject: Re: [R] Error " subscript out of bounds"
To: "Houhou Li
On Mar 13, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Houhou Li wrote:
Hello, R-users,
I have a datafile with 37313 records and each record has 5 different
measurements on the same variables. The format looks like this:
treeID, VIG0, VIG1, VIG2, VIG3, VIG4
I was trying to convert the one row record to 5 rows reco
Hello, R-users,
I have a datafile with 37313 records and each record has 5 different
measurements on the same variables. The format looks like this: treeID, VIG0,
VIG1, VIG2, VIG3, VIG4
I was trying to convert the one row record to 5 rows record with format like
this (treeID, MEASUREMENT, VIGO
On Sep 10, 2011, at 4:33 PM, avinash barnwal wrote:
Hi ,
I appreciate ur help, i do my homework carefully but here the
problem is i m
declaring a m as null matrix
Yes. That IS the problem.
to be filled by columns not by rows and
afterwards i m storing the values directly into the matrix
Hi ,
I appreciate ur help, i do my homework carefully but here the problem is i m
declaring a m as null matrix to be filled by columns not by rows and
afterwards i m storing the values directly into the matrix and i had gone
through same above mentioned error in previous r-help queries.
I am not
?debug
?browser
Read up on debugging your script.
On Saturday, September 10, 2011, avinash barnwal <
avinashbarnwal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> m<-matrix(byrow=FALSE)
> t<-as.list(na.exclude(x))_
> j<-0
> o<-0
> for(i in 1:998)
> {
> d<- 5*(i-1)+3
> if(t[[d]][[1]]>80)
> {
> j<-j+1
> e[j]<-d
> l<-lengt
Take a look at "m". Your error should be quite clear
More generally: we don't do homework help on this list.
Michael Weylandt
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:59 PM, avinash barnwal <
avinashbarnwal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> m<-matrix(byrow=FALSE)
> t<-as.list(na.exclude(x))
> j<-0
> o<-0
> for(i in 1:9
m<-matrix(byrow=FALSE)
t<-as.list(na.exclude(x))
j<-0
o<-0
for(i in 1:998)
{
d<- 5*(i-1)+3
if(t[[d]][[1]]>80)
{
j<-j+1
e[j]<-d
l<-length(t[[d]])
u<-t[[d]]
price_rand<-t[[d-1]]
n<-0
for(k in 1:l)
{
if((u[k]>49)&&(u[k]<51))
{
n<-n+1
m[n,j]<-price_rand[k]
}
}
}
}
I am getting error in assigning
On 13.05.2011 13:44, annekatrin...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello,
I want to do a simple correspondence analysis in R, using the ca package.
First, I create and define a 2-by-2-table (table=table(var1,var2)), which looks
like this:
Low(var1) high(var1)
Low(var2) 35 28
High(var2) 26
Hello,
I want to do a simple correspondence analysis in R, using the ca package.
First, I create and define a 2-by-2-table (table=table(var1,var2)), which looks
like this:
Low(var1) high(var1)
Low(var2) 35 28
High(var2) 26 32
Var1 and Var2 are categorical factors.
W
IRD,
It would certainly be more helpful to us if you showed more of your code or
what the dataset IWJR.missing is. Here's a couple of suggestions though.
I can see what you are doing is picking a random sample of this dataset.
Is the IWJR.missing object a data frame or a vector or what? Typica
Dear All
I have problem with this:
> IWJR.temp <-IWJR.missing[sample(1:length(IWJR.missing),1),]
Error: subscript out of bounds
How I can solved this.
Thanks
IRD
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
P
On Jun 14, 2010, at 6:48 PM, Yesha Patel wrote:
Hi all,
I want to get results for cox proportional hazards on SNP data. I'm
trying
to get HRs, CI's, & p-values for each individual SNP - this is
represented
by cov[,i]. When I run my code, I get the following error: subscript
out of
bound
You need to learn how to debug your program. When the error occurs,
look at the value of the indices in the offending statement -- you
will find that the problem is subscript out of bounds. Put the
following statement in your code:
options(error=utils::recover)
and then do ?browser to learn ho
Hi all,
I want to get results for cox proportional hazards on SNP data. I'm trying
to get HRs, CI's, & p-values for each individual SNP - this is represented
by cov[,i]. When I run my code, I get the following error: subscript out of
bounds. I don't know why I am getting this error.
I have looked
just a guess as i do not have your data:
with k=947 (last outer loop) m starts from 948 and runs backwards to
947. As your matrix probably only has 947 columns you get this error
Ayesha Khan schrieb:
Hi,
I'm trying to calculate euclidean distance for my matrix rx1. Its a big
matrix with
Take a look at what happens when k=947 (last time through the loop).
You are then indexing 'm in 948:947' so m==948 which is outside your
matrix.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Ayesha Khan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to calculate euclidean distance for my matrix rx1. Its a big
> matrix with 94
Hi,
I'm trying to calculate euclidean distance for my matrix rx1. Its a big
matrix with 947 elements. However when i do the following,
for(k in 1:947) for(m in (k+1):947){
A =rbind(A,c(k,m,ED(rx1[,k], rx1[,m])))
}
I get the following error:
ED(rx1[,k], rx1[,m]) : subscript out of bounds
I check
Note that length(m) = 16, but your m is only 4x4.
Try this m[is.na(m)] <- 0
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Alex99
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 9:06 AM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: [R] Error: "subscript out of bounds&q
Hi All,
I am trying to replace the "NA" values in a matrix by using the following
function:
it gets a "name" of the matrix or list or vector and turns it to a matrix
called "m".
then checks the elements of the matrix and if any of them is "NA" replace
them with "0".
rep=function(name){
m=as.mat
There is a good reason for the error in the
matrix case. Consider what would need to
happen for:
m[3, 5] <- 100
to work.
Consistency might be a good thing here, but
if so I think it should be an error for the 1-D
case. This might be a useful difference between
1-D arrays and vectors. However
Consider:
> x <- array(1:12,dim=12)
> x[13]
[1] NA]
> m <- array(1:12,dim=c(3,4))
> m[3,5]
Error: subscript out of bounds
Can anyone tell me it there is a Good Reason for the difference in
behaviour
between 1 dimensional and higher dimensional a
26 matches
Mail list logo
