Pat:
1. Thank you for this. Having not read your tutorial, but based on
what I know of your other efforts, I am sure that you are correct. Is
there a link to this on CRAN somewhere so I can refer to it in future
(too lazy to search myself)?
2. Thank you also for your continuing contributions to R
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Patrick Burns wrote:
> It's very seldom that I disagree with
> Bert, but here is one time.
>
> I don't think "An Introduction to R" is
> a suitable first read for people with
> little computational experience.
>
I must agree with Patrick here. The 'Intro to R' may
It's very seldom that I disagree with
Bert, but here is one time.
I don't think "An Introduction to R" is
a suitable first read for people with
little computational experience.
Better (I modestly suggest) would be:
http://www.burns-stat.com/pages/Tutor/hints_R_begin.html
which includes some ot
3 matches
Mail list logo
