I was using OS X native R editor. I would imagine that editor is as simple and
native as it gets. But, if it's truly native, why would Gmail think of my code
chunk so differently.
I'm just throwing it out there! I can always remove format in Gmail after
pasting as a precaution. :)
On Fri,
I am pretty sure it is not RStudio that is converting it to html... it is
Gmail... but many email programs seem to do this these days so that people can
send Wingdings symbols to their lolz pals, with no thought of the damage done
to computer code examples.
--
Sent from my phone. Please
Thanks for letting me know. That line does look familiar.
It's interesting how I simply copy and paste from R editor can result in
HTML format.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Jeff Newmiller
wrote:
> There is a little button near the bottom of the Gmail editing box
There is a little button near the bottom of the Gmail editing box that switches
to plain text. We can immediately tell because of the
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
line when we receive it, and sometimes it loses all of the line breaks or has
extra asterisks mixed in. You can look in the
I suppose for loop will suffice.
I simply copy & paste the code from R editor. From my email, it looks
plain. Is there a way to tell?
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Jeff Newmiller
wrote:
> The apply function is one of many alienate ways to write a loop. It is not
>
The apply function is one of many alienate ways to write a loop. It is not
appreciably more efficient in cpu time than a for loop.
Your example creates the numbers in the loop... does your actual data get
created in a loop? If so then your original code should be perfectly
serviceable. If not
In theory, I am generating from group 5 groups of random numbers, each
group has 3 samples.
Isn't apply() the replacement of loops?
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Jeff Newmiller
wrote:
> What is wrong with
>
> dat <- matrix(rnorm(15), nrow=5, ncol = 3)
>
> ?
>
> And
What is wrong with
dat <- matrix(rnorm(15), nrow=5, ncol = 3)
?
And what is this "no loop drama" you refer to? I use loops frequently to loop
around large memory gobbling chunks of code.
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
On February 24, 2017 5:02:46 PM PST, C W
Dear R,
I wanted to simulate a 5 by 3 matrix which fills up by either rows or
columns?
I started with the following filling the matrix by rows,
dat <- matrix(NA, nrow=5, ncol = 3)
for(i in 1:5){
dat[i, ] <- rnorm(3)
}
But, R is known for no loop drama. Any suggestions?
Thanks!
9 matches
Mail list logo