Re: [R] Inconsistent lattice scales$x$at, label behaviour for POSIXct

On 2/6/08, Alex Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's a related problem that works for numeric but not for POSIXct > > I am seeing it where a panel has no at labels, but others do. > > This simple example only has one panel with no at labels. > > > baseval = 0; > > xyplot(1:10 ~ (baseval + c(

Re: [R] Inconsistent lattice scales$x$at, label behaviour for POSIXct

Here's a related problem that works for numeric but not for POSIXct I am seeing it where a panel has no at labels, but others do. This simple example only has one panel with no at labels. > baseval = 0; > xyplot(1:10 ~ (baseval + c(1:10)), scales=list(x=list + (at=list(c()), labels=list(c()),

Re: [R] Inconsistent lattice scales$x$at, label behaviour for POSIXct

On 2/5/08, Alex Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have encountered the following behaviour in lattice in 2.6.1 (and > 2.4.0) which differs depending upon the type you use. I believe the > numeric behaviour to be correct, and the POSIXct behaviour to be in > error. > > When the x data and x axis

[R] Inconsistent lattice scales$x$at,label behaviour for POSIXct

I have encountered the following behaviour in lattice in 2.6.1 (and 2.4.0) which differs depending upon the type you use. I believe the numeric behaviour to be correct, and the POSIXct behaviour to be in error. When the x data and x axis in a lattice graph are POSIXct, and when using scal