On 27-08-2023 21:02, Ivan Krylov wrote:
On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 19:54:23 +0100
John Logsdon wrote:
Not so although it did lower the gc() time to 95.84%.
This was on a 16 core Threadripper 1950X box so I was intending to
use library parallel but I tried it on my lowly windows box that is
years old
On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 19:54:23 +0100
John Logsdon wrote:
> Not so although it did lower the gc() time to 95.84%.
>
> This was on a 16 core Threadripper 1950X box so I was intending to
> use library parallel but I tried it on my lowly windows box that is
> years old and got it down to 88.07%.
Does
Folks
I have come across an issue with gc() hogging the processor according to
Rprof.
Platform is Ubuntu 20.04 all up to date
R version 4.3.1
libraries: survival, MASS, gtools and openxlsx.
With default gc.auto options, the profiler notes the garbage collector
as self.pct 99.39%.
So I have
3 matches
Mail list logo
