[R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-11 Thread Albrecht, Dr. Stefan (APEP)
Dear Christian, maybe the Eclipse plug-in for R http://www.walware.de/goto/statet is ok for you. I have recently looked at it more closely and find it pretty good. It only lacks an outline and symbolic debugging (besides profiling) to be close to perfect. There are plug-ins for many other la

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-09 Thread Patrick Connolly
On Tue, 09-Oct-2007 at 11:28AM +0200, Scionforbai wrote: [...] |> Ok, so I am not the only one. Yes, I am using an old laptop with just |> 256M of ram, archlinux on it. Ess output it's just too slow, it gets |> me nervous. Is there a way to disable the syntax highlighting in the R In my version

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-09 Thread Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
On 10/9/07, Scionforbai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> is it only me or has anyone else the problem that running an R > >>> process within emacs is way much slower than in a regular terminal/ > >>> console? > > >> It's just you, and if you think some more about it, you'll see > >> why we are all

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-09 Thread Scionforbai
>>> is it only me or has anyone else the problem that running an R >>> process within emacs is way much slower than in a regular terminal/ >>> console? >> It's just you, and if you think some more about it, you'll see >> why we are all grinning. [ Hint: it can't be slower, outside of >> ridiculou

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-08 Thread Gregory. R. Warnes
gne af >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sendt: lø 06-10-2007 23:10 >> Til: Dirk Eddelbuettel >> Cc: r-help@r-project.org >> Emne: Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs >> >> >> >> On 10/6/07, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-08 Thread Rainer M. Krug
Christian Salas wrote: > Using Tinn-R (in windows) is possible to run latex and R from the same > editor, which was great. Now, I am using Ubuntu-linux, which has been > better than WinXP. Currently, I am using Emacs (and then install ESS) > for running LaTeX and R from a same editor-program (li

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-07 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
wanted to point out that this could explain the reported slowness. -Deepayan > Best regards > > Frede > > > > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne af [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sendt: lø 06-10-2007 23:10 > Til: Dirk Eddelbuettel > Cc: r-help@r-pro

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-07 Thread Frede Aakmann Tøgersen
Have you ever considered using C-u C-c C-r instead of C-c C-r? Best regards Frede Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne af [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: lø 06-10-2007 23:10 Til: Dirk Eddelbuettel Cc: r-help@r-project.org Emne: Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-07 Thread Patrick Connolly
On Sat, 06-Oct-2007 at 11:01AM +0200, Scionforbai wrote: |> Hi, |> |> > What features are you missing in emacs that you wish were there? Are |> > these ESS features or LaTeX related features? |> |> is it only me or has anyone else the problem that running an R process |> within emacs is way muc

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-06 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 13:42 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 6 October 2007 at 11:01, Scionforbai wrote: > | > What features are you missing in emacs that you wish were there? Are > | > these ESS features or LaTeX related features? > | > | is it only me or has anyone else the problem that run

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-06 Thread deepayan . sarkar
On 10/6/07, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6 October 2007 at 11:01, Scionforbai wrote: > | > What features are you missing in emacs that you wish were there? Are > | > these ESS features or LaTeX related features? > | > | is it only me or has anyone else the problem that runni

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-06 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 6 October 2007 at 11:01, Scionforbai wrote: | > What features are you missing in emacs that you wish were there? Are | > these ESS features or LaTeX related features? | | is it only me or has anyone else the problem that running an R process | within emacs is way much slower than in a regular

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-06 Thread Scionforbai
> kate infact allows you to pipe commands to console (tools->pipe to > console). I have pretty much the same setup as you. But I have defined > a shortcut for piping the commands to console in kate. So I just > have to highlight commands using shift and arrow keys, and press F4 > (my shortcut) and

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-06 Thread Scionforbai
Hi, > What features are you missing in emacs that you wish were there? Are > these ESS features or LaTeX related features? is it only me or has anyone else the problem that running an R process within emacs is way much slower than in a regular terminal/console? (linux here)

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-05 Thread Richard M. Heiberger
What are your criteria for friendliness? What features are you missing in emacs that you wish were there? Are these ESS features or LaTeX related features? Rich -Original Message- want something like Emacs (of course including auctex and ess), but not Emacs. Something like Tinn-R [htt

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-05 Thread jiho
On 2007-October-05 , at 18:56 , Christian Salas wrote: > Using Tinn-R (in windows) is possible to run latex and R from the same > editor, which was great. Now, I am using Ubuntu-linux, which has been > better than WinXP. Currently, I am using Emacs (and then install ESS) > for running LaTeX and R

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-05 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 22:09 +0200, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On 10/5/07, Christian Salas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was wondering if you know of a linux editor that is able to run R and > > compile LaTeX files from it. > > Well, there is Winefish for LaTeX and Bluefish for R. The former is > b

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-05 Thread Liviu Andronic
On 10/5/07, Christian Salas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering if you know of a linux editor that is able to run R and > compile LaTeX files from it. Well, there is Winefish for LaTeX and Bluefish for R. The former is based on the latter. Not exactly one editor, but you may be interested

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-05 Thread Roland Rau
Christian Salas wrote: > I want something like Emacs (of course including auctex and ess), but > not Emacs. Something like Tinn-R [http://www.sciviews.org/Tinn-R/] is > the best solution, as far as I know for it, unfortunately is only > available for Windows. XEmacs? :-) If you don't want Emac

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-05 Thread Christian Salas
hi ScionForbai yes i know auctex, but i do not know Kate, as I mentioned, I compile LatEx documents from Emacs and also run R from it (thanks to ESS). Regarding this that you said > in the built-in terminal on the lower part of the screen. I use the > mouse to copy/paste lines from a script to

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-05 Thread Christian Salas
hey dylan, but i am looking for only one editor that is able to run R and also be able to compile Latex files (like Emacs but i don't like too much emacs) --- Christian SalasE-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-05 Thread Scionforbai
> I was wondering if you know of a linux editor that is able to run R and > compile LaTeX files from it. I assume you already know auctex for emacs. Well, currently I use emacs+auctex for latex and kate for R. ess doesn't satisfy me, and I find R processes much slower when launched within emacs. k

Re: [R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-05 Thread Dylan Beaudette
On Friday 05 October 2007, Christian Salas wrote: > Using Tinn-R (in windows) is possible to run latex and R from the same > editor, which was great. Now, I am using Ubuntu-linux, which has been > better than WinXP. Currently, I am using Emacs (and then install ESS) > for running LaTeX and R from a

[R] Linux editor for R+LaTeX, but not Emacs

2007-10-05 Thread Christian Salas
Using Tinn-R (in windows) is possible to run latex and R from the same editor, which was great. Now, I am using Ubuntu-linux, which has been better than WinXP. Currently, I am using Emacs (and then install ESS) for running LaTeX and R from a same editor-program (like i was doing with Tinn-R in