Re: [R] MCMCglmm multinomial model results

2018-03-24 Thread Bert Gunter
Does not the sum of probabilities (on the untransformed scale) = 1, whence only 4 outcome categories to predict? Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" co

Re: [R] MCMCglmm multinomial model results

2018-03-24 Thread Michelle Kline
Hi David, Thanks for your comment. I haven't posted the data because they are unpublished and include human subjects so there are issues with sharing on a list serv, but I thought perhaps someone had encountered a similar problem and would already know the answer. I will reconsider whether my Uni

Re: [R] MCMCglmm multinomial model results

2018-03-23 Thread David Winsemius
> On Mar 22, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Michelle Kline > wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks in advance for any help on this question. I'm running multinomial > models using the MCMCglmm package. The models have 5 outcome variables > (each with count data), and an additional two random effects built into the > m

[R] MCMCglmm multinomial model results

2018-03-22 Thread Michelle Kline
Hi, Thanks in advance for any help on this question. I'm running multinomial models using the MCMCglmm package. The models have 5 outcome variables (each with count data), and an additional two random effects built into the models. The issue is that when I use the following code, the summary only