[R] PLM package PGGLS strange behavior

2012-04-27 Thread Millo Giovanni
4, 34132 Trieste (Italy) tel. +39 040 671184 fax +39 040 671160 --- original message --- Message: 18 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:07:16 +0200 From: Ruben de Bliek rubendebl...@gmail.com To: r-help@r-project.org Subject: [R] PLM package PGGLS strange behavior Message-ID

Re: [R] PLM package PGGLS strange behavior

2012-04-27 Thread Ruben de Bliek
Bliek rubendebl...@gmail.com To: r-help@r-project.org Subject: [R] PLM package PGGLS strange behavior Message-ID: CAMjFNLVpiDsSVemYf=ctx2fzljqekhoobnctc8fc2csrgkx...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain When using the PLM package (version 1.2-8), I encounter the probem that calling

[R] R: PLM package PGGLS strange behavior

2012-04-27 Thread Millo Giovanni
--- original message --- Message: 18 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:07:16 +0200 From: Ruben de Bliek rubendebl...@gmail.com To: r-help@r-project.org Subject: [R] PLM package PGGLS strange behavior Message-ID

Re: [R] PLM package PGGLS strange behavior

2012-04-27 Thread Ruben de Bliek
*A:* Millo Giovanni *Cc:* r-help@r-project.org *Oggetto:* Re: [R] PLM package PGGLS strange behavior Thank you Millo. I was a little confused by the random versus pooling nomenclature used in PLM, thank you for clearing that up. I still have the issue of not receiving the proper coefficient

[R] PLM package PGGLS strange behavior

2012-04-26 Thread Ruben de Bliek
When using the PLM package (version 1.2-8), I encounter the probem that calling the FGLS estimator evokes strange behavior, when choosing the random effects model. After calling the PGGLS function to estimate FGLS, PLM gives me a warning, stating that the random model has been replaced with the