Re: [R] Package norm has been removed. What to use for Maximum L

2009-07-17 Thread Ted Harding
On 17-Jul-09 13:01:46, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Ted > Harding wrote: >> Follow-up: >> >> On 17-Jul-09 12:38:27, Ted Harding wrote: >>> On a point of information: The licence in question: >>> >>> License: The software may be distributed free of charge and used >>>

Re: [R] Package norm has been removed. What to use for Maximum L

2009-07-17 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Ted Harding wrote: > Follow-up: > > On 17-Jul-09 12:38:27, Ted Harding wrote: >> On a point of information: The licence in question: >> >> License: The software may be distributed free of charge and used >>          by anyone if credit is given. It has been tested f

Re: [R] Package norm has been removed. What to use for Maximum L

2009-07-17 Thread Ted Harding
Follow-up: On 17-Jul-09 12:38:27, Ted Harding wrote: > On a point of information: The licence in question: > > License: The software may be distributed free of charge and used > by anyone if credit is given. It has been tested fairly > well, but it comes with no guarantees and t

Re: [R] Package norm has been removed. What to use for Maximum L

2009-07-17 Thread Ted Harding
On 17-Jul-09 12:12:01, Uwe Ligges wrote: > Achim Zeileis wrote: >> On Fri, 17 Jul 2009, Daniel Abbott wrote: >>> Hello, >>> I apologize if an answer to my questions is available, or if I >>> submitted this question incorrectly. I have read the mailing lists, >>> as well as the R Project and CRAN ho