As someone who fwded initial story to both SAS and R lists, I find the messages on this forum and on SAS-L forum (which are publicly available) a contrast ( One list is partying like they won the World Series -the other one talks of either self denial.....or of self appraisal and anguish) http://www.listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S2=sas-l&q=&s=New+York+Times+&f=&a=Dec+2008&b=
Having said that, can we get back to coding..... Ajay The best things in life are free. On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Gabor Grothendieck <ggrothendi...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > On 7 January 2009 at 18:24, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > | By running the code below we see that the: > > | - sum of the three seems to be rising at a constant rate > > | - S is declining > > | - SAS and R are rising > > | - R is rising the fastest through its completed its phase > > | of highest growth which ended around 2004 > > > > I wonder whether we need to account for traffic on all the additional > r-sig-* > > mailing lists ? > > > > Of the handful that I follow, some seem to have taken traffic from > r-help. > > This could account for (at least parts of) the apparent traffic growth > > slowdown since 2004 as many of these added lists appeared only in the > last > > few years. > > > > Good observation. It would be interesting to combine the data from all > the lists to see what the effect is. > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
