Bert has pointed out to me that the R definition of "deprecated" is
considerably more draconian than that in most other systems:
? Deprecated
"These functions are provided for compatibility with older versions
of *R* only, and may be defunct as soon as the next release."
I would certain
replies inline below.
Bert Gunter wrote:
> Replies inline below.
>
>
> [bert (?)]...?tapply says that the first argument is an **atomic**
> vector. A
> factor is not an atomic vector. So tapply interprets it as such by looking
> only at its representation, which is as integer values.
>
Bert,
Thanks for your reply. I suspect we agree more than you might think
Comments inline below. I've snipped out parts.
-s
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
> Rationale? -- you'll have to ask the developers
Hmm. It would be nice if this could be doc
Replies inline below.
Best regards,
-- Bert
___
From: macra...@gmail.com [mailto:macra...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stavros
Macrakis
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:53 AM
To: Bert Gunter
Cc: Patrizio Frederic; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] repeated searchin
4 matches
Mail list logo
