Hi All,
We need to get clarification from Kristin as to what kinds of issues are raised
in the context of a risk analysis from her IT people.
Since Kristin's wording indicated:
"...all programs that our employees/providers use must be vetted through the
IT Department by way of a Risk
I think the question of validation is very different from the risk analysis
referenced in the subject line.
On the subject of the FDA accepting open source software. Personally I've
done two sBLA submissions where simulation results were essential aspects
of the filings. Both were approved and
Dear all,
any (!) software used in regulated environments has to be validated.
Regrettably is is a misconception by many working in the pharmaceutical
industry that only studies evaluated by SAS are accepted by the FDA.
See this one-pager https://www.fda.gov/media/109552/download and a
No, it was precisely my *point* that Matlab is proprietary.
The medical researchers I knew a few years ago refused to use
R on the grounds that the international agencies they dealt
with all used SAS, which is proprietary. So I am wondering
if "ALL programs that our employees/PROVIDERS use"
Ummm...Except that Matlab is proprietary and for profit, not open source.
Did you perhaps mean Octave?
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and
sticking things into it."
-- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip )
On Thu, Jun
Just as a matter of curiosity, what are some of the programs
that have already been vetted, what methods were used, and
how long did the vetting take?
As the R guidance points out, R was not designed for
creating or updating medical records, so it should be
treated the same way as say LibreOffice
I work in Pharma and we use R in all the companies I've worked for. They
are really paranoid and it's used in regulated environments as well with
patient data. So there should be something they can do.
Kristin: I can put you in touch with vendors who do our regulated work in R
if you're
On 6/18/20 3:41 PM, John Harrold wrote:
Hello Kristin,
Are you talking about risk analysis from the perspective of software
vulnerabilities?
It appears that is exactly what is being asked. What is not clear is
whether the installation would be offered to persons or groups on the
network
R is open source software that is offered as-is, and many users of R utilize
additional "contributed" packages which are developed and vetted independently
of the R Core members. In addition, it is common for users of R to add minor
functionality in the course of obtaining useful results, which
Hello Kristin,
Are you talking about risk analysis from the perspective of software
vulnerabilities?
John
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:21 PM Wait, Kristin wrote:
> HI all,
>
> I am with a NYS major trauma center and all programs that our
> employees/providers use must be vetted through the IT
HI all,
I am with a NYS major trauma center and all programs that our
employees/providers use must be vetted through the IT Department by way of a
Risk Analysis.
Is there someone I would talk to about this?
I scoured your website and could not find a specific person.
Thank you so much
Kristin
>internal
>> information regarding the company.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Evan Lindenberger
>> --
>> *From:* Bert Gunter
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 18, 2019 5:45:07 PM
>> *To:* Rui Barradas
>> *Cc:* Evan Lindenberger; r-
the company.
Sincerely,
Evan Lindenberger
From: Bert Gunter
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 5:45:07 PM
To: Rui Barradas
Cc: Evan Lindenberger; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] R Software
WARNING: This email originated from outside of Johnson & Wales University
-
> *From:* Bert Gunter
> *Sent:* Monday, February 18, 2019 5:45:07 PM
> *To:* Rui Barradas
> *Cc:* Evan Lindenberger; r-help@r-project.org
> *Subject:* Re: [R] R Software
>
>
> *WARNING:* This email originated from *outside* of Johnson & Wales
>
To add to what Rui said, go here:
https://www.r-project.org/
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and
sticking things into it."
-- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip )
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 2:11 PM Rui Barradas wrote:
Hello,
I do not speak for the R Foundation but I believe you are not aware that
R is a computer language for statistics biostatistics and (scientific)
graphics.
- R itself does not collect data.
- Security policies are left to the users.
- You can program whatever you want since R is Turing
Hello,
My name is Evan Lindenberger and I work at the Johnson & Wales information
security office. We received a request for R Software, but I have a few
questions before we start using R, such as:
- What information does R collect?
- Does the R Foundation have a written information security
On 23 Feb 2016, at 17:02 , Ashley Porter wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
> I wanted to reach out as I am looking to learn more about the R Project / R
> Statistical Programming software, particularly as it's been utilizing in
> power plant industries. I work in the
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Ashley Porter <
apor...@theplanetforward.com> wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
> I wanted to reach out as I am looking to learn more about the R Project / R
> Statistical Programming software, particularly as it's been utilizing in
> power plant industries. I work in the
: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 8:02 AM
> To: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: [R] R Software Program Help
>
> Good Morning,
>
> I wanted to reach out as I am looking to learn more about the R Project / R
> Statistical Programming software, particularly as it's been utilizing in power
Good Morning,
I wanted to reach out as I am looking to learn more about the R Project / R
Statistical Programming software, particularly as it's been utilizing in
power plant industries. I work in the energy industry and my clients are
starting to look for Risk Analysts proficient in this tool,
On 23 Sep 2015, at 02:33 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> I don't see why this puzzles you. A simple explanation is that Urkund
> is incompetent.
That much I figured. What I was puzzled about was _how_ it was being
incompetent. Also how it could be so in a way that
Your professor should immediately recognize that the quoted code is standard
regression input/output and that the Urkund results in this case are without
merit.
> On Sep 22, 2015, at 7:27 AM, BARRETT, Oliver wrote:
>
>
> Dear 'R' community support,
>
>
> I am a
> -Original Message-
> From: pda...@gmail.com
> Sent: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:41:19 +0200
> To: murdoch.dun...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [R] 'R' Software Output Plagiarism
>
>
> On 23 Sep 2015, at 02:33 , Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
&
Marc,
I don't think Copyright/Intellectual property issues factor into this. Urkund
and similar tools are to my knowledge entirely about plagiarism. So the issue
would seem to be that the R output is considered identical or nearly indentical
to R output in other published orotherwise
Hi,
With the usual caveat that I Am Not A Lawyerand that I am not speaking on
behalf of any organization...
My guess is that they are claiming that the output of R, simply being copied
and pasted verbatim into your thesis constitutes the use of copyrighted output
from the software.
It is
Very good point about the referencing.
I wonder if this is happening to users of Stata or SAS as well?
John Kane
Kingston ON Canada
> -Original Message-
> From: marc_schwa...@me.com
> Sent: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:24:13 -0500
> To: bgunter.4...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [
e
Kingston ON Canada
> -Original Message-
> From: oliver.barr...@skema.edu
> Sent: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:27:03 +
> To: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: [R] 'R' Software Output Plagiarism
>
>
> Dear 'R' community support,
>
>
> I am a student at Skema busin
Isn't plagiarism detection based on overlaps with sentence structure?
That way, it would catch plagiarism if someone simply did a
find-and-replace. But that would also catch regressions with the same
output format.
How long was the original thesis? If 25% of it was all regression
output, sounds
Peter,
Great distinction.
I was leaning in the direction that the "look and feel" of the output (standard
wording, table structure, column headings, significance stars and so forth in
the output) is similar to whatever Urkund is using as the basis for the
comparison and less so on an exact
Gunter; BARRETT, Oliver; R-help
Subject: Re: [R] 'R' Software Output Plagiarism
Peter,
Great distinction.
I was leaning in the direction that the "look and feel" of the output (standard
wording, table structure, column headings, significance stars and so forth in
the output) is similar to
On 22/09/2015 4:06 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
> Marc,
>
> I don't think Copyright/Intellectual property issues factor into this. Urkund
> and similar tools are to my knowledge entirely about plagiarism. So the issue
> would seem to be that the R output is considered identical or nearly
>
Dear 'R' community support,
I am a student at Skema business school and I have recently submitted my MSc
thesis/dissertation. This has been passed on to an external plagiarism service
provider, Urkund, who have scanned my document and returned a plagiarism report
to my professor having
1. It is highly unlikely that we could be of help (unless someone else
has experienced this and knows what happened). You will have to
contact the Urkund people and ask them why their algorithms raised the
flags.
2. But of course, the regression methodology is not "your own" -- it's
just a
Dear Sarah,
Thanks for your email. I'll describe the problm but without the screenshots
then.
Firstly, I think Ive correctly installed R.
I have installed R for Windows via the R site, CRAN and then UK
University of Bristol or UK Imperial College London. Both times, I have
installed the
Hi
-Original Message-
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces@r-
project.org] On Behalf Of Andy Siddaway
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 11:24 AM
To: Sarah Goslee
Cc: r-help
Subject: Re: [R] R software installation problem
Dear Sarah,
Thanks for your email
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Andy Siddaway
andysidda...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dear Sarah,
Thanks for your email. I'll describe the problm but without the screenshots
then.
Firstly, I think I’ve correctly installed R.
I have installed R for Windows via the R site, CRAN and then UK –
Dear R-help,
Please could I have some quick guidance on what I'm doing wrong when trying
to instal R software? (I have read the R-FAQs and instructions, and watched
youtube instructional videos on installing R, but they didn't help)
I've attached screenshots to hopefully make what I've done
Hi Andy,
This list strips most forms of attachments.
Instead, you need to tell us what OS and version you're using, how
you're trying to install, and what's going wrong, in detail.
Sarah
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Andy Siddaway
andysidda...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dear R-help,
Please
Looking for r-software resource persons for the Sensitization and Capacity
Building Workshop on Free Software and Knowledge Initiatives in
Agricultural Research for Development to be held in the month of July 2012
at Hyderabad. https://sites.google.com/site/fskiard/
Hello,
I have downloaded several times your program R-2.11.1 32.exe, after the
download when I click on the exe file I always receive the following error:
The setup files are corrupted. Please obtain a new copy of the program.
Could you help me to download English or Russian version for Windows
This is not a problem of R, but of your own computer. If it is a
corrupted download, it might be stored in the temporary internet
files. Delete all temporary internet files and try to download again.
If that doesn't work, you'll have to dive into the Windows itself.
That error can have numerous
On 06/16/2010 03:08 PM, Gulbanu Rys wrote:
Hello,
I have downloaded several times your program R-2.11.1 32.exe, after the
download when I click on the exe file I always receive the following error:
The setup files are corrupted. Please obtain a new copy of the program.
Could you help me to
43 matches
Mail list logo