Em 21/4/2011 11:36, Jeremy Miles escreveu:
Just because it comes from a book does not make it true or correct.
Books are subject to considerably less peer review than journal
articles. Publishers will publish a book written by (almost) anyone -
I know this, because I've written some of them and
Just because it comes from a book does not make it true or correct.
Books are subject to considerably less peer review than journal
articles. Publishers will publish a book written by (almost) anyone -
I know this, because I've written some of them and they were
published.
There really isn't much
Remélem valaki ezt is elolvassa, megérti, és válaszol a problémámra.
A gondom a következõ:
Kiszámoltattam a maradékokat az R commanderrel, és az SPSS -el is. És itt
kezdõdik igazán a gond. Az SPSS a Studentizált törölt maradékokra ugyanazt
az eredményt dobta, mint az Rcmdr a Studentizált maradéko
Hi,
maybe my eyes are not very well, but I can't see any difference between
both results up to different rounding policies...
Am 20.04.2011 23:36, schrieb Tamas Barjak:
> Hy all!
>
> Excuse me for the inaccurate composition, but I do not speak well in
> English.
>
> I noticed a mistake in Rcmd
What's the mistake? They look like the same numbers to me. (Although
I didn't check them all).
Oh, hang on, are you saying that they're different kinds of residuals,
but they are the same? This is because SPSS names its residuals
wrongly.
SPSS has standardized residuals, these are residuals di
Hy all!
Excuse me for the inaccurate composition, but I do not speak well in
English.
I noticed a mistake in Rcmdr (?) -- Models menu --- Add observation
statistics to data --- Studentized residuals.
My output :
(Rcmdr !!!)
rstudent.RegModel.1 (= *Studentized residuals*)
-1.5690952
-0.0697492
6 matches
Mail list logo
