__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
confused with sampling(random data) in R. My data and codes
for the scenario above are
in the attached file. I want to understand where I am making a mistake. Any
comment is deeply appreciated.
Kind Regards
Seyit Ali
Xvar-c
confused with sampling(random data) in R. My data and codes
for the scenario above are
in the attached file. I want to understand where I am making a mistake. Any
comment is deeply appreciated.
Kind Regards
Seyit Ali
Xvar-c
correlation it is 0.9657125 which is much higher than correlation for my
original data.
I am doing sampling in another program and getting at least 1% higher
correlation than mine.
Now I am getting confused with sampling(random data) in R. My data and codes
for the scenario above are below
and
obtain correlation it is 0.9657125 which is much higher than correlation for my
original data.
I am doing sampling in another program and getting at least 1% higher
correlation than mine.
Now I am getting confused with sampling(random data) in R. My data and codes
for the scenario above
is much higher than correlation for
my original data.
I am doing sampling in another program and getting at least 1% higher
correlation than mine.
Now I am getting confused with sampling(random data) in R. My data and codes
for the scenario above are below
Xvar-c
You need to sample pairs rather than sampling individually within Xvar
and Yvar. You also generally sample with replacement. If you sample
without replacement for the length of the data, then you just get the
same set.
On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:54 AM, skayis selcuk wrote:
in another program and getting at least 1% higher
correlation than mine.
Now I am getting confused with sampling(random data) in R. My data and
codes for the scenario above are
in the attached file. I want to understand where I am making a mistake. Any
comment is deeply appreciated.
Kind
and Yvar and
obtain correlation it is 0.9657125 which is much higher than correlation for my original data.
I am doing sampling in another program and getting at least 1% higher correlation than mine.
Now I am getting confused with sampling(random data) in R. My data and codes for the scenario
10 matches
Mail list logo
