Re: [R] Strange message after reading multiple scripts from one folder

2016-07-29 Thread MacQueen, Don
For what it's worth (perhaps little...), I would normally do for (pn in pathnames) source(pn) It's clearer to read and won't return a strange value. I doubt there will be a noticeable difference in speed. It can easily be extended to be more informative, as in for (pn in pathnames) { cat('---

Re: [R] Strange message after reading multiple scripts from one folder

2016-07-29 Thread Keith Jewell
I can't immediately see it in the help text but it seems that source returns a list with two named elements; value and visible. I surmise that it is returned using withVisible (qv). KJ On 29/07/2016 13:26, jim holtman wrote: Hard to tell without seeing the scripts. Do you have a matrix in

Re: [R] Strange message after reading multiple scripts from one folder

2016-07-29 Thread Fox, John
to:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Frank S. > Sent: July 29, 2016 6:52 AM > To: r-help@r-project.org > Subject: [R] Strange message after reading multiple scripts from one folder > > Dear list, > > I have one folder named "scripts_JMbayes", wich contains

Re: [R] Strange message after reading multiple scripts from one folder

2016-07-29 Thread jim holtman
Hard to tell without seeing the scripts. Do you have a matrix in your scripts that have "value" and "visible" as row names? You probably have some statement that is causing output and so the problem is "your" as to how to avoid the message. So look at your scripts to see if anything refers to

[R] Strange message after reading multiple scripts from one folder

2016-07-29 Thread Frank S.
Dear list, I have one folder named "scripts_JMbayes", wich contains 10 R scripts. I can read them properly by doing: > pathnames <- list.files(pattern="[.]R", path="Mydir/scripts_JMbayes", > full.names = TRUE) > sapply(pathnames, USE.NAMES = FALSE, FUN = source,) However, R generates the