[R] Subject: Re ZINB by Newton Raphson??

2010-06-22 Thread Prof. John C Nash
I have not included the previous postings because they came out very strangely on my mail reader. However, the question concerned the choice of minimizer for the zeroinfl() function, which apparently allows any of the current 6 methods of optim() for this purpose. The original poster wanted to

Re: [R] Subject: Re ZINB by Newton Raphson??

2010-06-22 Thread Achim Zeileis
John, thanks for the comments, very useful. Just three short additions specific to the ZINB case: 1. zeroinfl() doesn't uses BFGS (by default) and not Newton-Raphson because we have analytical gradients but not an analytical Hessian. 2. If the default starting values do not work,

Re: [R] Subject: Re ZINB by Newton Raphson??

2010-06-22 Thread Ted Harding
Regarding Newton-Raphson, I would add that there are certain kinds of function for which the method *cannot* work. N-R is essentially a root-finding technique, and when used for finding a minimum (or maximum) it is applied to finding the root of the deriviative. As an example of a class of