Re: [R] Superimposing y-variables in Lattice formulas

2008-11-17 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Stavros Macrakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for the pointer to your paper "Getting Started with Lattice > Graphics" -- it looks very useful. > > I think we're talking past each other on the question of the semantics > of formula operators, and it's proba

Re: [R] Superimposing y-variables in Lattice formulas

2008-11-16 Thread hadley wickham
Hi Stavros, > I think we're talking past each other on the question of the semantics > of formula operators, and it's probably not productive to continue. I > would guess that the underlying issue is that we come from different > communities, and so have different background assumptions. Perhaps

Re: [R] Superimposing y-variables in Lattice formulas

2008-11-16 Thread Stavros Macrakis
Thank you for the pointer to your paper "Getting Started with Lattice Graphics" -- it looks very useful. I think we're talking past each other on the question of the semantics of formula operators, and it's probably not productive to continue. I would guess that the underlying issue is that we co

Re: [R] Superimposing y-variables in Lattice formulas

2008-11-16 Thread Rolf Turner
Deepayan --- you are too patient by half! :-) cheers, Rolf Turner ## Attention:\ This e-mail message is privileged and confid...{{dropped:9}} __ R-help@r-pro

Re: [R] Superimposing y-variables in Lattice formulas

2008-11-16 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
On 11/16/08, Stavros Macrakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Deepayan, > > Thanks again for your explanations. I must admit I am still > struggling with some of these concepts (though I have in fact read > more than just help pages!), and I would be delighted to find a > holistic introduction to

Re: [R] Superimposing y-variables in Lattice formulas

2008-11-16 Thread Stavros Macrakis
Deepayan, Thanks again for your explanations. I must admit I am still struggling with some of these concepts (though I have in fact read more than just help pages!), and I would be delighted to find a holistic introduction to the concepts of formulae and of the lattice system -- in fact I have or

Re: [R] Superimposing y-variables in Lattice formulas

2008-11-15 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
On 11/15/08, Stavros Macrakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Deepayan Sarkar > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> ...But how do I specify that I want to display all the Subjects on a... > single graph, superimposing them all? > > > > > Have you tried > > xyplot ( co

Re: [R] Superimposing y-variables in Lattice formulas

2008-11-15 Thread Stavros Macrakis
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Deepayan Sarkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ...But how do I specify that I want to display all the Subjects on a... >> single graph, superimposing them all? > > Have you tried > xyplot ( conc ~ time , Indometh, groups = Subject ) ? Thanks very much for your help

Re: [R] Superimposing y-variables in Lattice formulas

2008-11-14 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Stavros Macrakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Given a data frame of a categorical variable and two continuous > variables, I would like to display one continuous variable against the > other for each value of the categorical variable, all superimposed on > the same

[R] Superimposing y-variables in Lattice formulas

2008-11-14 Thread Stavros Macrakis
Given a data frame of a categorical variable and two continuous variables, I would like to display one continuous variable against the other for each value of the categorical variable, all superimposed on the same plot. For example: data(Indometh); str(Indometh) Classes 'nfnGroupedData', 'nfGroup