Re: [R] Type I and Type III SS in anova

2008-09-26 Thread John Fox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Stefan Uhmann > Sent: September-26-08 8:20 AM > To: r-help@r-project.org > Subject: Re: [R] Type I and Type III SS in anova > > Dear list, > > slightly OT: can you recommend me any sources where I can find more > a

Re: [R] Type I and Type III SS in anova

2008-09-26 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
ptember-25-08 9:56 PM To: r-help@r-project.org Subject: [R] Type I and Type III SS in anova Hi all, I have been trying to calculate Type III SS in R for an unbalanced two-way anova. However, the Type III SS are lower for the first factor compared to type I but higher for the second factor (see bel

Re: [R] Type I and Type III SS in anova

2008-09-26 Thread Stefan Uhmann
. Regards, Stefan John Fox schrieb, Am 26.09.2008 12:36: Dear Menelaos, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Menelaos Stavrinides Sent: September-25-08 9:56 PM To: r-help@r-project.org Subject: [R] Type I and Type III SS in anova Hi all, I have

Re: [R] Type I and Type III SS in anova

2008-09-26 Thread John Fox
Dear Menelaos, > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Menelaos Stavrinides > Sent: September-25-08 9:56 PM > To: r-help@r-project.org > Subject: [R] Type I and Type III SS in anova > > Hi all, > I have been tryi

[R] Type I and Type III SS in anova

2008-09-25 Thread Menelaos Stavrinides
Hi all, I have been trying to calculate Type III SS in R for an unbalanced two-way anova. However, the Type III SS are lower for the first factor compared to type I but higher for the second factor (see below). I have the impression that Type III are always lower than Type I - is that right? And a