[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Stefan Uhmann
> Sent: September-26-08 8:20 AM
> To: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R] Type I and Type III SS in anova
>
> Dear list,
>
> slightly OT: can you recommend me any sources where I can find more
> a
ptember-25-08 9:56 PM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: [R] Type I and Type III SS in anova
Hi all,
I have been trying to calculate Type III SS in R for an unbalanced two-way
anova. However, the Type III SS are lower for the first factor compared to
type I but higher for the second factor (see bel
.
Regards,
Stefan
John Fox schrieb, Am 26.09.2008 12:36:
Dear Menelaos,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Menelaos Stavrinides
Sent: September-25-08 9:56 PM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: [R] Type I and Type III SS in anova
Hi all,
I have
Dear Menelaos,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Menelaos Stavrinides
> Sent: September-25-08 9:56 PM
> To: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: [R] Type I and Type III SS in anova
>
> Hi all,
> I have been tryi
Hi all,
I have been trying to calculate Type III SS in R for an unbalanced two-way
anova. However, the Type III SS are lower for the first factor compared to
type I but higher for the second factor (see below). I have the impression
that Type III are always lower than Type I - is that right?
And a
5 matches
Mail list logo