Re: [R] Ubuntu vs Mac OS X

2008-04-26 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Three comments, all from the 'R Installation and Adminstration' manual. 1) In general there is a small performance penalty for using a 64-bit version of R (larger pointers to move around). 2) For speed, bulld yourself a non-shared-library version of R. Those binary maintainers are supplying

Re: [R] Ubuntu vs Mac OS X

2008-04-26 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 26 April 2008 at 12:27, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: | 3) If you are doing matrix algebra you want an optimized BLAS. The CRAN | build of R for Mac OS by default uses vecLib (which is optimized by | Apple). On other OSes R can be built to use optimized BLAS (see the | manual) -- my

[R] Ubuntu vs Mac OS X

2008-04-25 Thread Guillaume Blanchet
Hi ! I have installed R-2.7.0 64-bits on a computer where the new Ubuntu version (8.04) was installed. This computer is a 3.2 GHz Dual-core with 2 Gb of RAM. To test how fast (I though !) this machine is, I compared two simple matrix manipulations between Ubuntu and my laptop (a MacBook Pro

Re: [R] Ubuntu vs Mac OS X

2008-04-25 Thread Roy Mendelssohn
On Apr 25, 2008, at 4:34 PM, Guillaume Blanchet wrote: Hi ! I have installed R-2.7.0 64-bits on a computer where the new Ubuntu version (8.04) was installed. This computer is a 3.2 GHz Dual-core with 2 Gb of RAM. To test how fast (I though !) this machine is, I compared two simple