On 4 March 2010 23:47, Jim Lemon wrote:
> On 03/05/2010 04:11 AM, Bert Gunter wrote:
>>
>> Folks:
>>
>> Rolf's (appropriate, in my view) response below seems symptomatic of an
>> increasing tendency of posters to hide their identities with pseudonyms
>> and
>> fake headers. While some of this may
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Jim Lemon wrote:
> I had a working hypothesis about this, but decided to check the data before
> replying. Looking at the ten most recent obvious pseudonyms, all were from
> free email accounts like gmail or yahoo. A few of these included all or part
> of the name
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
(Notice, BTW, that I too have taken to sending mailing lists via Gmail.
Nothing to do with hiding my identity, but I'm now working behind an
Exchange server, and those beasts won't do server-side filtering, so
webmail would be a pain if regular mail got mixed with r-help
Jim Lemon wrote:
I think Rolf's guess about the provenance of the request was based
upon the carefully copied format, which Blind Freddie could see was
homework (and the requester actually admitted it!). Personally, I
never answer requests that have the due date for the assignment at the
botto
On 03/05/2010 04:11 AM, Bert Gunter wrote:
Folks:
Rolf's (appropriate, in my view) response below seems symptomatic of an
increasing tendency of posters to hide their identities with pseudonyms and
fake headers. While some of this may be due to identity paranoia (which I
think is overblown for t
Folks:
Rolf's (appropriate, in my view) response below seems symptomatic of an
increasing tendency of posters to hide their identities with pseudonyms and
fake headers. While some of this may be due to identity paranoia (which I
think is overblown for this list), I suspect that a good chunk of it
6 matches
Mail list logo
