Re: [R] Very strange function() behaviour.

2012-01-02 Thread iliketurtles
Hi Bert, Sorry for the sub-par post.. again. I've revamped my OP, I hope it's sufficient now. Thank you. - Isaac Research Assistant Quantitative Finance Faculty, UTS -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/as-formula-with-either-lapply-or-for-loop-tp4252877p425

Re: [R] Very strange function() behaviour.

2012-01-02 Thread Bert Gunter
(To me, anyway) Incoherent. Reproducible code needed. -- Bert On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:59 AM, iliketurtles wrote: > Sorry if there's an easy answer to this problem, but here goes.. > * > INTRODUCTION & CONTEXT* > > I'm creating a function where the number of entries in the lm(y~...) > varies

[R] Very strange function() behaviour.

2012-01-02 Thread iliketurtles
Sorry if there's an easy answer to this problem, but here goes.. * INTRODUCTION & CONTEXT* I'm creating a function where the number of entries in the lm(y~...) varies. i.e. depending on the function input I want lm(y~x1+x2+x3), sometimes I'll want lm(y~x1) only, et cetera. I've completed this

Re: [R] Very strange function() behaviour.

2011-12-30 Thread iliketurtles
Okay it's working perfectly now. I restarted R and it worked on my first 5 goes. Can anybody shed light on how this kind of thing can happen? - Isaac Research Assistant Quantitative Finance Faculty, UTS -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Very-strange-functio

[R] Very strange function() behaviour.

2011-12-30 Thread iliketurtles
Hi, R newb here. I've coded a function that inputs N dimensional array(s) [or class=numeric if it's dim=1] of coefficients and tstats, where dim(coef_matrix)=dim(tstat_matrix), it will then output a same dimension matrix of coefficients pasted to tstats in brackets pasted to significance stars. If