Doug Bates's
comments on the issue.
-- Bert
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Mike Marchywka wrote:
>
>> Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 07:45:26 -0700
>> From: gunter.ber...@gene.com
>> To: sibylle.stoec...@gmx.ch
>> CC: r-help@r-project.org
>> Subject: Re: [R] anova(
Mike Marchywka hotmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 07:45:26 -0700
> > From: gunter.berton gene.com
> > To: sibylle.stoeckli gmx.ch
> > CC: r-help r-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [R] anova(lme.model)
> >
> > Sounds to me lik
> Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 07:45:26 -0700
> From: gunter.ber...@gene.com
> To: sibylle.stoec...@gmx.ch
> CC: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R] anova(lme.model)
>
> Sounds to me like you should really be seeking help from your local
> statistician, not this list. W
Sounds to me like you should really be seeking help from your local
statistician, not this list. What you request probably cannot be done.
What is wrong with what you get from lme, whose results seem fairly
clear whether the P values are accurate or not?
Cheers,
Bert
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 4
Dear R users
Topic: Linear effect model fitting using the nlme package (recomended by
Pinheiro et al. 2008 for unbalanced data set).
The R help provides much info about the controversy to use the anova(lme.model)
function to present numerator df and F values. Additionally different p-values
ca
5 matches
Mail list logo