Re: [R] difference between max in summary table and max function

2015-02-16 Thread Franckx Laurent
gham [mailto:aebingh...@gmail.com] Sent: zaterdag 14 februari 2015 8:16 To: 'Martyn Byng'; r-help@r-project.org Cc: Franckx Laurent Subject: RE: [R] difference between max in summary table and max function I thought I'd chime in ... submitting the following: ?summary Provides the followin

Re: [R] difference between max in summary table and max function

2015-02-13 Thread Allen Bingham
Original Message- From: R-help [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Martyn Byng Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 3:15 AM To: Franckx Laurent; r-help@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] difference between max in summary table and max function Its a formatting thing, try summary(testrow,d

Re: [R] difference between max in summary table and max function

2015-02-13 Thread Martyn Byng
Its a formatting thing, try summary(testrow,digits=20) -Original Message- From: R-help [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Franckx Laurent Sent: 13 February 2015 11:00 To: r-help@r-project.org Subject: [R] difference between max in summary table and max function Dear all

[R] difference between max in summary table and max function

2015-02-13 Thread Franckx Laurent
Dear all I have found out that the max in the summary of an integer vector is not always equal to the actual maximum of that vector. For example: > testrow <- c(1:131509) > summary(testrow) Min. 1st Qu. MedianMean 3rd Qu.Max. 1 32880 65760 65760 98630 131500 > max(tes