Thank you so much for the suggestion. I should simplify my formula.
Kazz
2012/6/22 Achim Zeileis
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Kazu Nada wrote:
>
> Thank you so much for the suggestion.
>> I want to estimate interactions between "the attributes of the choice set"
>> and "subject-specific data (e.g., g
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Kazu Nada wrote:
Thank you so much for the suggestion.
I want to estimate interactions between "the attributes of the choice set"
and "subject-specific data (e.g., gender or income)".
However, y ~ x | z notation is to see the interaction between "the
alternatives of choice s
Thank you so much for the suggestion.
I want to estimate interactions between "the attributes of the choice set"
and "subject-specific data (e.g., gender or income)".
However, y ~ x | z notation is to see the interaction between "the
alternatives of choice set" and "subject-specific data (e.g., gen
Thank you so much for the suggestion. I have tried " mlogit's y ~ x | z
notation." but not succeed. My formula may have a lot of interaction. Can
we use "glmer" (or "glmmML") function to estimate mixed logit model instead
of "mlogit"?
Kazz
2012/6/8 Achim Zeileis
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Kazu Nada
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Kazu Nada wrote:
Hi, I need help to do "mlogit" including "l( ) function.
When I put following command,
"Error in parse(text = x) : :2:0:" is shown.
(1) Your example is not reproducible for us, see the footer of this mail
and follow the posting guide.
(2) You manually
Hi, I need help to do "mlogit" including "l( ) function.
When I put following command,
"Error in parse(text = x) : :2:0:" is shown.
res1<-(mlogit(choice~train+bus+plane+taxi+year+cost
+I(gen*train)+I(gen*bus)+I(gen*plane)+I(gen*taxi)+I(gen*year)+I(gen*cost)
+I(age*train)+I(age*bus)+I(age
6 matches
Mail list logo
