This was a change in tidyr 0.7.0 that is causing a lot of confusion,
so we are preparing tidyr 0.7.1 which will back this change out.
If you want a work around in the meantime, you can express your
operation a bit more elegantly as:
library(tidyr)
df <- data.frame(v1 = 1:5, somestring = 6:10, v3
Or perhaps two exclamation points would be better ('unquote' in the
tidyverse lexicon, 3 bangs is 'unquote-splice').
Bill Dunlap
TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:20 AM, William Dunlap wrote:
> Try putting !!! (three exclamation symbols) in front of which(...)==
>
Looks like a bug to me. I think you need to correspond with the package
(tidyr?) maintainer, perhaps by putting a bug report on GitHub.
Next time please make your example reproducible by including the necessary
"library" function calls.
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
On Aug
Try putting !!! (three exclamation symbols) in front of which(...)==
The non-standard evaluation in the tidyverse can cause confusion.
Bill Dunlap
TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Eugeny Melamud <
eugeny.mela...@lanit-tercom.com> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> The fol
Inline.
-- Bert
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Eugeny Melamud
wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> The following code (executed in console)...
> somevar <- data.frame(v1 = 1:5, somestring = 6:10, v3 = 11:15, v4 =
> 16:20);
> somevar %>% gather(key = var, value = val, which(names(somevar) ==
> "som
Hi all!
The following code (executed in console)...
somevar <- data.frame(v1 = 1:5, somestring = 6:10, v3 = 11:15, v4 = 16:20);
somevar %>% gather(key = var, value = val, which(names(somevar) ==
"somestring"):length(somevar)) %>% head(2);
throws...
Error in which(names(somevar) == "so
6 matches
Mail list logo