After one month of struggle, I lost confidence on Spotfire, it's totally
not user-friendly. Yes it is very good for certain data presentation, but
you still need do heavy lifting on data processing by other software. For
me, R is the perfect tool and has best user supporting group. I send this
emai
Thanks for your note Uwe. Yes I think a lot of the needed work was related
to implementing R functions that many of us use that are not available in
S-Plus, plus what to do about plotmath. It wasn't enough to just be able to
load the R package. I don't think implementation of the needed R functi
On 12.01.2012 17:38, Frank Harrell wrote:
As a slight aside, Tibco/Spotfire originally planned to provide a capability
to load R packages into S-Plus. This always seemed to me to be a hard thing
to do, and if my understanding is correct, this proved to be too difficult
to do in S-Plus, at lea
As a slight aside, Tibco/Spotfire originally planned to provide a capability
to load R packages into S-Plus. This always seemed to me to be a hard thing
to do, and if my understanding is correct, this proved to be too difficult
to do in S-Plus, at least for large packages such as mine.
Frank
Ter
John,
Spotfire is a menu driven data exploration tool, very popular here
with biologists who found that their previous Excel based approach
doesn't cut it for large data sets. When TIBCO wanted to expand the
tool with further quantitative features they made (I think) a bright
decision to purchas
Roughly 5 years ago, a Spotfire rep at the Joint Statistical Meetings
told me they routinely interfaced with both R and S-Plus. I'm not 100%
certain, but I believe they have many customers who use that facility
today. Spencer
On 1/11/2012 10:37 AM, Bert Gunter wrote:
Peter et. al:
1. I ag
Behalf Of peter dalgaard
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:17 AM
To: Duncan Murdoch
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] general question on Spotfire
On Jan 11, 2012, at 16:28 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 12-01-11 10:13 AM, John Smith wrote:
>> Dear R users,
>>
>>
Peter et. al:
1. I agree with Duncan: wrong list.
2. AFAIK, Spotfire **already** can interface with R.
-- Bert
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 8:17 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>
> On Jan 11, 2012, at 16:28 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
>> On 12-01-11 10:13 AM, John Smith wrote:
>>> Dear R users,
>>>
>>> I h
On Jan 11, 2012, at 16:28 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 12-01-11 10:13 AM, John Smith wrote:
>> Dear R users,
>>
>> I have been using R for 10 years, and I love it very much. But in my daily
>> job for drug discovery, some people use Spotfire. I tried Spotfire on
>> couple of data sets. It sounds
I am struggling whether I should learn Spotfire or not. I just want some
statisticians inputs.
Thanks
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 12-01-11 10:13 AM, John Smith wrote:
>
>> Dear R users,
>>
>> I have been using R for 10 years, and I love it very much. But in my
On 12-01-11 10:13 AM, John Smith wrote:
Dear R users,
I have been using R for 10 years, and I love it very much. But in my daily
job for drug discovery, some people use Spotfire. I tried Spotfire on
couple of data sets. It sounds I still need do some data manipulation
before plot figures. For ex
Dear R users,
I have been using R for 10 years, and I love it very much. But in my daily
job for drug discovery, some people use Spotfire. I tried Spotfire on
couple of data sets. It sounds I still need do some data manipulation
before plot figures. For example, I can not plot figure with data arr
12 matches
Mail list logo