package.
-Original Message-
From: peter dalgaard [mailto:pda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 25 May 2012 9:37p
To: ilai
Cc: Steve Taylor; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] glm(weights) and standard errors
Weighting can be confusing: There are three standard forms of weighting which
you need
[mailto:dwinsem...@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 May 2012 3:37p
To: Steve Taylor
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] glm(weights) and standard errors
On May 21, 2012, at 10:58 PM, Steve Taylor wrote:
Is there a way to tell glm() that rows in the data represent a certain
number
as one of mine, and doesn't do what
I'm looking for.
-Original Message-
From: David Winsemius [mailto:dwinsem...@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 May 2012 3:37p
To: Steve Taylor
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] glm(weights) and standard errors
On May 21, 2012, at 10:58 PM
To: Steve Taylor
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] glm(weights) and standard errors
On May 21, 2012, at 10:58 PM, Steve Taylor wrote:
Is there a way to tell glm() that rows in the data represent a certain
number of observations other than one? Perhaps even fractional
values?
Using
Is there a way to tell glm() that rows in the data represent a certain number
of observations other than one? Perhaps even fractional values?
Using the weights argument has no effect on the standard errors. Compare the
following; is there a way to get the first and last models to produce the
On May 21, 2012, at 10:58 PM, Steve Taylor wrote:
Is there a way to tell glm() that rows in the data represent a
certain number of observations other than one? Perhaps even
fractional values?
Using the weights argument has no effect on the standard errors.
Compare the following; is
6 matches
Mail list logo
