On Jul 16, 2013, at 8:52 AM, Hermann Norpois wrote:
> I did not think of something like "try". I thouht that there should always
> be a value if I do a logistic regression but sometimes the values are far
> from being meaningful. So there is a cut-off.
That seems implausilbe. I think you are jus
I did not think of something like "try". I thouht that there should always
be a value if I do a logistic regression but sometimes the values are far
from being meaningful. So there is a cut-off. My plan was to change the
cut-off.
Thanks
Johannes
2013/7/15 Bert Gunter
> I think what you want is
I think what you want is
?try ##or
?tryCatch
## The second is more flexible but slightly more complicated.
to trap the error and perhaps refit the model without interaction?
Cheers,
Bert
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Hermann Norpois wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use glm within a function testing
Hello,
I use glm within a function testing for the appearence of the coexistence
of (minor allels in a subset of) snps. And then I extract the
Pr(>|z|)-value for the interaction. Principally it works but sometimes the
function stops because this "value for the interaction" is NA. For
instance, t
4 matches
Mail list logo