csiro.au> writes:
>
> Here is a demo you may like to consider. (I can see what you are trying
> to do with your loops, but I prefer to do it this way.)
This is just for pedagogical purpose,
so I like to keep the simple-minded 'for'
loop.
But what I really wonder is why do I not get the right
inal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of toby909
Sent: Sunday, 6 April 2008 3:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [R] lme cant get parameter estimated correctly
I am caught in a mental trap. Why isn't the between groups variance
estimated
(0.0038) to be
I am caught in a mental trap. Why isn't the between groups variance estimated
(0.0038) to be around the value with which I generated the data (0.0002)?
Thanks Toby
set.seed(76589437887)
fph = 0.4
Sigh = sqrt(0.0002)
Sigi = sqrt(0.04)
ci = 1
fpi = matrix(,7200,3)
for (i in 1:90) {
fph =
3 matches
Mail list logo