Re: [R] memory.limit

Derek Stephen Elmerick wrote: Hello -- So, independently of any other code, the memory limit error I referenced is not a problem. The issue I am running into now is that our analytics group must go back to all existing code and comment out the memory limit reference [See my example below]. I'm

Re: [R] memory.limit

Hello -- So, independently of any other code, the memory limit error I referenced is not a problem. The issue I am running into now is that our analytics group must go back to all existing code and comment out the memory limit reference [See my example below]. I'm sure there is a quick fix. If any

Re: [R] memory.limit

Hello Stephen, I can confirm that I get the same behavior in my Windows machine. Here is a summary: > memory.limit() [1] 2046 > memory.limit(2092) Error in trunc(.Internal(memory.size(size))) : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function > memory.limit() [1] 2092 As you described, the fu

[R] memory.limit

I ran the memory limit function in R 2.9.0 and received the 'error' below. The memory appears to update correctly, so there's probably no implication beyond cosmetic; however, thought I would make sure since the function as written did not generate the same error in my 2.8.0 version of R. Thanks

Re: [R] question about running out of memory on R -- memory.limit change in R 2.6.0?

Earl, Reported memory sizes work ok on Vista 64. If I ask for 3.5M it will give it, even though I have only 2Mb of RAM. It devaults to 2Mb as expected. Op Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:38:07 +0100 schreef Earl F. Glynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "jim holtman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[E

Re: [R] question about running out of memory on R -- memory.limit change in R 2.6.0?

"jim holtman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > --max-mem-size=N > (Windows only) Specify a limit for the amount of memory to be used > both for R objects and working areas. This is set by default to the > smaller of 1.5Gb24 and the amount of physical RAM in the machine