Re: [R] nonparametric logistic regression based on locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (lowess)

2011-06-04 Thread Thomas Lumley
Actually they say they used SAS, and Googling for "SAS local linear logistic" suggests they used PROC GAM with the LOESS() smoother. Probably quite similar to gam::gam(). -thomas On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Thomas Lumley wrote: > The Stanform gam()  [gam package] has choices of spline or

Re: [R] nonparametric logistic regression based on locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (lowess)

2011-06-04 Thread Thomas Lumley
The Stanform gam() [gam package] has choices of spline or local-polynomial (defaulting to local-linear) smoothers. That's probably the best match for the description. It shouldn't be necessary to guess -- the paper should have cited the package -- but we know that is often missed. -thomas

Re: [R] nonparametric logistic regression based on locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (lowess)

2011-06-04 Thread Bert Gunter
Take a look at packages mgcv or gam (and probably others). Different smoothers are used, but it's nonlinear, nonparametric logistic regression. which is usually the important part. It also penalizes, which can be even more important than which smoother is used. -- Bert On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 9:02

Re: [R] nonparametric logistic regression based on locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (lowess)

2011-06-04 Thread David Winsemius
On Jun 4, 2011, at 11:41 AM, zhu yao wrote: Dear UseRs: Recently, I have read an article regarding the association between age and lymph node metastases. http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/27/18/2931.long In statistical analysis, the authors stated "Because a nonlinear relationship between age

[R] nonparametric logistic regression based on locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (lowess)

2011-06-04 Thread zhu yao
Dear UseRs: Recently, I have read an article regarding the association between age and lymph node metastases. http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/27/18/2931.long In statistical analysis, the authors stated "Because a nonlinear relationship between age and lymph node involvement was expected based on e