Re: [R] par(mfrow=c(4,2)) vs. lattice

2008-06-10 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
mfrow is for classic graphics and when the graphs are unrelated. lattice is for grid graphics and typically when the panels are related such as being the same plot but conditioned on different factor levels. These are typical uses only as one can write arbitary panels with lattice and produce rel

Re: [R] par(mfrow=c(4,2)) vs. lattice

2008-06-10 Thread Bert Gunter
AM To: r-help@r-project.org Subject: [R] par(mfrow=c(4,2)) vs. lattice I have had good sucess with the par(mfrow=c(#,#)) for formating graphs and they look good to me. I have seen a lot of use of the lattice package and thought I would go fishing on the list for y'all's comments. Is th

[R] par(mfrow=c(4,2)) vs. lattice

2008-06-10 Thread stephen sefick
I have had good sucess with the par(mfrow=c(#,#)) for formating graphs and they look good to me. I have seen a lot of use of the lattice package and thought I would go fishing on the list for y'all's comments. Is there a time when lattice would be easier more appropriate for certain graphics over