[R] peer-reviewed (or not) publications on R

2012-10-30 Thread Paul Artes
. Is there anything bibliometric (number of citations)? I will happily send something back to the list... Best wishes Paul -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/peer-reviewed-or-not-publications-on-R-tp4647871.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive

Re: [R] peer-reviewed (or not) publications on R

2012-10-30 Thread R. Michael Weylandt
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Paul Artes paul_h_ar...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Dear Friends, I'm contributing to a paper on a new R package for a clinical (medicine, ophthalmology) audience, and part of the mission is to encourage people who might be occasional users of Excel or SPSS, to become

Re: [R] peer-reviewed (or not) publications on R

2012-10-30 Thread Bert Gunter
As usual, Google is your friend! Google on growth of R software. The first 2 hits are relevant, and there are others further down. -- Bert On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:05 AM, R. Michael Weylandt michael.weyla...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Paul Artes

Re: [R] peer-reviewed (or not) publications on R

2012-10-30 Thread Albyn Jones
More links on reproducible research: Opinion: Open and Free: Software and Scientific Reproducibility Seismological Research Letters Volume 83 · Number 5 · September/October 2012 Reproducible Research in Computational Science Roger D. Peng Science 2 December 2011: 1226-1227. albyn On