Subject: Re: [R] predicting without a model
>
> Felipe Carrillo > href="http://yahoo.com";>yahoo.com>
> writes:
## snip
> In the absence of any other information, I would say your
best bet would just
> be to take the weekly average across the
previous ye
I forgot to reply to all: This is what I sent earlier to him:
"""
I would look at the data. You don't really have any information other than
what appears to be the weekly passage. I would look to see if there is any
relationship between the current value of passage and previous values of
passage.
Felipe Carrillo yahoo.com> writes:
## snip
In the absence of any other information, I would say your
best bet would just be to take the weekly average across the
previous years. There are lots of ways to do this (tapply,
aggregate, etc.), but cast() works:
fallavg <- cast(fallmelt,value="val
Hello:
I have 5 years of weekly passage data and want to predict fish passage
for the following year. I don't have a model to use to predict data for
the sixth year. Can I somehow still predict based on these five years?
I just want to see on the graph what the predicted year would look like
and ho
4 matches
Mail list logo
