Re: [R] summary.manova rank deficiency error + data

Peter Dalgaard wrote: Pedro Mardones wrote: Thanks for the reply. The SAS output is attached but seems to me that doesn't correspond to the wihtin-row contrasts as you suggested. By the way, yes the data are highly correlated, in fact each row correspond to the first part of a signal vector. Tha

Re: [R] summary.manova rank deficiency error + data

Peter Dalgaard wrote: Pedro Mardones wrote: Thanks for the reply. The SAS output is attached but seems to me that doesn't correspond to the wihtin-row contrasts as you suggested. By the way, yes the data are highly correlated, in fact each row correspond to the first part of a signal vector. Tha

Re: [R] summary.manova rank deficiency error + data

Pedro Mardones wrote: Thanks for the reply. The SAS output is attached but seems to me that doesn't correspond to the wihtin-row contrasts as you suggested. By the way, yes the data are highly correlated, in fact each row correspond to the first part of a signal vector. Thanks anyway PM Ag

Re: [R] summary.manova rank deficiency error + data

Thanks for the reply. The SAS output is attached but seems to me that doesn't correspond to the wihtin-row contrasts as you suggested. By the way, yes the data are highly correlated, in fact each row correspond to the first part of a signal vector. Thanks anyway PM

Re: [R] summary.manova rank deficiency error + data

Pedro Mardones wrote: Dear R-users; Previously I posted a question about the problem of rank deficiency in summary.manova. As somebody suggested, I'm attaching a small part of the data set. #*** "test" <- structure(.Data = list(structure(.Data =

[R] summary.manova rank deficiency error + data

Dear R-users; Previously I posted a question about the problem of rank deficiency in summary.manova. As somebody suggested, I'm attaching a small part of the data set. #*** "test" <- structure(.Data = list(structure(.Data = c(rep(1,3),rep(2,18),re