Re: [R] "R is not a validated software package.."

2007-06-09 Thread AJ Rossini
You've just opened up another bit of confusion. A submission package has many pieces, and that cited one is just a small part of it. As Frank has mentioned (though perhaps tritely), and Cody points out -- The only issue that a Pharma has to worry about is whether they know enough about a sof

Re: [R] "R is not a validated software package.."

2007-06-09 Thread AJ Rossini
On Friday 08 June 2007, Giovanni Parrinello wrote: > Dear All, > discussing with a statistician of a pharmaceutical company I received > this answer about the statistical package that I have planned to use: > > As R is not a validated software package, we would like to ask if it > would rather be p

Re: [R] A coding question involving variable assignments in ifelse()

2007-04-28 Thread AJ Rossini
I agree entirely with Gabor. My advice would be to just ignore the people who think differently -- however, if you want those particular folks to respond, you'll have to play by their rules. (and if you don't play by their rules, you'll just have to ignore the consequences -- this _IS_ the i

Re: [R] Rserve and R to R communication

2007-04-10 Thread AJ Rossini
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 23:17, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote: > Of course, you are right there. I think that might still be the case. > At the time we made our decision, and decided to go for MPI, MPI 2 was > already out, and MPI seemed "more like the current/future standard" > than PVM. That's alwa

Re: [R] Rserve and R to R communication

2007-04-10 Thread AJ Rossini
On Monday 09 April 2007 23:02, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote: > (Yes, maybe I should check snowFT, but it uses PVM, and I recall a > while back there was a reason why we decided to go with MPI instead of > PVM). There is no reason that you can't run both MPI and PVM on the same cluster. There is a pa

Re: [R] R and clinical studies

2007-03-17 Thread AJ Rossini
On Friday 16 March 2007 09:36, Delphine Fontaine wrote: > Thanks for your answer which was very helpfull. I have another question: > > I have read in this document > (http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-intro.pdf) that most of the > programs written in R are ephemeral and that new releases are

[R] ECB/Sidebar/R (Emacs) was: Re: kate editor for R

2007-01-20 Thread AJ Rossini
On Friday 19 January 2007 15:39, Dirk wrote: > As I am doing more C++ work, I glanced at oo-browser, sidebar, ecb (all in > Debian/Ubuntu). Would a real Emacs hacker be able to these to R code too? Dirk - That functionality (though relatively minimal, i.e. ECB/sidebar support through imenu) s