House
30 Monument Street
London EC3R 8HB
UK
www.RMS.com
Tel: +44 20 7444 7783
Fax: +44 20 7444 7601
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 September 2006 00:45
To: Mark Pinkerton
Cc: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] Beta
Cc: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] Beta stochastic simulation
On 9/15/2006 6:43 AM, Mark Pinkerton wrote:
Hi Duncan,
Thanks for having a look at this. Find attached a zip with all the
relevant files to run the simulation. I am running this on Windows XP,
R version 2.3.1.
Does
20 7444 7783
Fax: +44 20 7444 7601
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 September 2006 12:15
To: Mark Pinkerton
Cc: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] Beta stochastic simulation
On 9/15/2006 6:43 AM, Mark Pinkerton wrote:
Hi Duncan
: +44 20 7444 7783
Fax: +44 20 7444 7601
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 September 2006 12:15
To: Mark Pinkerton
Cc: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] Beta stochastic simulation
On 9/15/2006 6:43 AM, Mark Pinkerton wrote:
Hi
7783
Fax: +44 20 7444 7601
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 September 2006 12:15
To: Mark Pinkerton
Cc: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] Beta stochastic simulation
On 9/15/2006 6:43 AM, Mark Pinkerton wrote:
Hi Duncan,
Thanks for having
Monument Street
London EC3R 8HB
UK
www.RMS.com
Tel: +44 20 7444 7783
Fax: +44 20 7444 7601
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 September 2006 12:15
To: Mark Pinkerton
Cc: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] Beta stochastic
Hi,
I am finding that I get quite different results when I interchange the
following equivalent lines for sampling from a beta distribution in my
r script. The rbeta line is correct judging by the summary statistics of
the simulated values, while the qbeta line consistently leads to a
higher mean
On 9/14/2006 1:42 PM, Mark Pinkerton wrote:
Hi,
I am finding that I get quite different results when I interchange the
following equivalent lines for sampling from a beta distribution in my
r script. The rbeta line is correct judging by the summary statistics of
the simulated values, while
On 9/14/2006 5:26 PM, Mark Pinkerton wrote:
Hi Duncan,
I had also validated the logic with a simple test which is why I was
surprised by the differences I was seeing from tthe more complex simulation.
I am running R on a Windows 2000 - I'll have to check which version at my
desk tomorrow
