RE: [R] Bug in qnorm or pnorm?

2004-08-06 Thread Trenkler, Dietrich
> -Original Message- > From: Deepayan Sarkar > Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 3:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [R] Bug in qnorm or pnorm? > > On Friday 06 August 2004 08:13, Trenkler, Dietrich wrote: > > > Given that pnorm(8.30) d

Re: [R] Bug in qnorm or pnorm?

2004-08-06 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
On Friday 06 August 2004 08:13, Trenkler, Dietrich wrote: > Given that pnorm(8.30) delivers 1 shouldn't we get Inf > for x<-8.30;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) ? Why? > pnorm(8.30) [1] 1 > qnorm(pnorm(8.30)) ## same as qnorm(1) [1] Inf > 8.30 - qnorm(pnorm(8.30)) ## same as 8.30 - Inf [1] -Inf This seems

RE: [R] Bug in qnorm or pnorm?

2004-08-06 Thread Trenkler, Dietrich
> -Original Message- > From: Trenkler, Dietrich > Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 3:13 PM > To: 'r-help' > Subject: [R] Bug in qnorm or pnorm? > > I found the following strange behavior using qnorm() and pnorm(): > > > x<-8.21;x-qnorm

[R] Bug in qnorm or pnorm?

2004-08-06 Thread Trenkler, Dietrich
I found the following strange behavior using qnorm() and pnorm(): > x<-8.21;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.0004638484 > x<-8.22;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.01046385 > x<-8.23;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.02046385 > x<-8.24;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.03046385 > x<-8.25;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.04046385 > x<-8.26;x-qn