Frank E Harrell Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:42:07 +0100
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've tried to analyze some data with a CMH test. My 3 dimensional
> > contingency tables are 2x2xN where N is usually between 10 and 100.
> >
> > The problem is
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:42:07 +0100
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've tried to analyze some data with a CMH test. My 3 dimensional
> contingency tables are 2x2xN where N is usually between 10 and 100.
>
> The problem is that there may be 2 strata with opposite counts (the 2x2
> contige
Hi Arne,
This seems to be more a statistics than an R problem.
Let's assume, one stratum is male and the other is female, and that you are
giving estrogen. With women, it may be better to have more estrogen, with
men to have less. Thus, if you recode
women: (more estrogen/less estroge
Hello,
I've tried to analyze some data with a CMH test. My 3 dimensional contingency
tables are 2x2xN where N is usually between 10 and 100.
The problem is that there may be 2 strata with opposite counts (the 2x2
contigency table for these are reversed), producing opposite odds ratios that
cancle
