Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:14:27 +0200, Uwe Ligges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
The objective should be that creating a package is as easy as this:
f - function()1; g - function()2; d - 3; e - 4:5
package.skeleton(list=c(f,g,d,e), name=AnExample)
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
Duncan Murdoch dmurdoch at pair.com writes:
: On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:28:44 + (UTC), Gabor Grothendieck
: ggrothendieck at myway.com wrote:
:
: 1. when I run skeleton.package realize that I must use the arg
:path = library
:The example that is shown there
Uwe Ligges ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de writes:
:
: Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
:
: Duncan Murdoch dmurdoch at pair.com writes:
:
: : On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:28:44 + (UTC), Gabor Grothendieck
: : ggrothendieck at myway.com wrote:
: :
:
: : 1. when I run skeleton.package
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
Uwe Ligges ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de writes:
:
: Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
:
: Duncan Murdoch dmurdoch at pair.com writes:
:
: : On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:28:44 + (UTC), Gabor Grothendieck
: : ggrothendieck at myway.com wrote:
: :
:
: : 1. when I
From: Gabor Grothendieck
[snip]
The objective should be that creating a package is as easy as this:
f - function()1; g - function()2; d - 3; e - 4:5
package.skeleton(list=c(f,g,d,e), name=AnExample)
library(AnExample)
f()
which means that the package needs to be
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 04:32:55 + (UTC), Gabor Grothendieck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Duncan Murdoch dmurdoch at pair.com writes:
: On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:28:44 + (UTC), Gabor Grothendieck
: ggrothendieck at myway.com wrote:
:
: 1. when I run skeleton.package realize that I must use the
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:14:27 +0200, Uwe Ligges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
The objective should be that creating a package is as easy as this:
f - function()1; g - function()2; d - 3; e - 4:5
package.skeleton(list=c(f,g,d,e), name=AnExample)
Folks:
Without entering the debate, just a little addendum to Andy's suggestions and
Duncan's and Gabor's comments about the difficulty of building (simple,
containing no binaries and just a few functions) packages for R.
I have for some time now built such R-code only .rda files. It is a
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:40:33 + (UTC), Gabor Grothendieck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger,
A list of the steps referred to below would be of interest.
I realize the extensions manual exists but what I was
thinking of was just a list of the minimal steps you take
when you create a package for
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
Roger,
A list of the steps referred to below would be of interest.
I realize the extensions manual exists but what I was
thinking of was just a list of the minimal steps you take
when you create a package for yourself.
Thanks.
It has already been automated. See
Duncan Murdoch dmurdoch at pair.com writes:
:
: On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:40:33 + (UTC), Gabor Grothendieck
: ggrothendieck at myway.com wrote:
:
: Roger,
:
: A list of the steps referred to below would be of interest.
: I realize the extensions manual exists but what I was
: thinking of was
Thanks for the information. It *should* be that simple; thanks for
pointing out ways in which it is not.
Some more specific comments below...
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:28:44 + (UTC), Gabor Grothendieck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Duncan Murdoch dmurdoch at pair.com writes:
:
: On Sun, 11 Jul
Duncan Murdoch dmurdoch at pair.com writes:
: On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:28:44 + (UTC), Gabor Grothendieck
: ggrothendieck at myway.com wrote:
:
: 1. when I run skeleton.package realize that I must use the arg
:path = library
:The example that is shown there appears to omit that.
:
:
Roger,
A list of the steps referred to below would be of interest.
I realize the extensions manual exists but what I was
thinking of was just a list of the minimal steps you take
when you create a package for yourself.
Thanks.
Roger D. Peng rpeng at jhsph.edu writes:
:
: In fact, there is an
14 matches
Mail list logo
