Re: [R] F Dist

2004-02-19 Thread Pierre-Andre Cornillon
Hello, the order of argument is not the correct one: p(2.45,6,28) [1] 0.9503618 P.A. On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Joerg Schaber wrote: > Hi, > > why is it that in tables for the F distribution it is for example > > F0.95[6,28]=2.45 or F0.95[10,20]=2.35 > > but > > > pf(6,28,2.45) > [1] 0.8854934 > >

Re: [R] F Dist

2004-02-19 Thread Uwe Ligges
Joerg Schaber wrote: Hi, why is it that in tables for the F distribution it is for example F0.95[6,28]=2.45 or F0.95[10,20]=2.35 but > pf(6,28,2.45) [1] 0.8854934 > pf(10,20,2.35) [1] 0.9300167 Thanks for clarifying, jeorg What you are really going to do is: pf(2.45, 6, 28) # [1] 0.950

RE: [R] F Dist

2004-02-19 Thread Liaw, Andy
... because that should have been: > pf(2.45, 6, 28) [1] 0.9503618 > pf(2.35, 10, 20) [1] 0.950176 When arguments are not named, the order is significant. Andy > From: Joerg Schaber > > Hi, > > why is it that in tables for the F distribution it is for example > > F0.95[6,28]=2.45 or F0.95[10

[R] F Dist

2004-02-19 Thread Joerg Schaber
Hi, why is it that in tables for the F distribution it is for example F0.95[6,28]=2.45 or F0.95[10,20]=2.35 but > pf(6,28,2.45) [1] 0.8854934 > pf(10,20,2.35) [1] 0.9300167 Thanks for clarifying, jeorg __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.s