I just updated the packages on my pc (windows xp). When loading lme4 I get
> library(lme4)
Error: package 'Matrix' 0.995-1 was found, but >= 0.995.2 is required by 'lme4'
'Matrix' 0.995-1 is indeed installed on my computer, but update.packages()
does not capture a never version; and seemingly
Søren Højsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just updated the packages on my pc (windows xp). When loading lme4 I get
>
> > library(lme4)
> Error: package 'Matrix' 0.995-1 was found, but >= 0.995.2 is required by
> 'lme4'
>
> 'Matrix' 0.995-1 is indeed installed on my computer, but
> upda
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Søren Højsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>I just updated the packages on my pc (windows xp). When loading lme4 I get
>>
>> > library(lme4)
>>Error: package 'Matrix' 0.995-1 was found, but >= 0.995.2 is required by
>>'lme4'
>>
>>'Matrix' 0.995-1 is indeed install
We (Doug, Martin and I) are trying hard to debug an error in Matrix.
Martin and Doug have ideas for a bugfix and I am checking right now.
The latest version of Matrix that passed the checks was Matrix_0.995-1
which is still available from
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/contrib/2.2/last/
T
Søren Højsgaard wrote:
> We (Doug, Martin and I) are trying hard to debug an error in Matrix.
> Martin and Doug have ideas for a bugfix and I am checking right now.
>
> The latest version of Matrix that passed the checks was
> Matrix_0.995-1 which is still available from
> http://cran.r-project
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Søren Højsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I just updated the packages on my pc (windows xp). When loading lme4 I get
> library(lme4)
Error: package 'Matrix' 0.995-1 was found, but >= 0.995.2 is required by 'lme4'
[...]
2) When actually trying t
I see that Matrix, lme4 and SASmixed in zip format have been 'rolled back' to
the previous versions - which I have now installed. Running
library(SASmixed)
data(Demand)
example(Demand)
gives
Demand> fm1Demand <- lmer(log(d) ~ log(y) + log(rd) + log(rt) +
log(rs) + (1 | State) + (1
I've just hit this problem as well and as I am slumming it on XP at the
moment, I don't have the compilation tools to use the .tar.gz version.
I also notice that the numbering format has changed. Is this intentional?
Best wishes
John
John Logsdon "Try to make thin
Søren Højsgaard wrote:
> I see that Matrix, lme4 and SASmixed in zip format have been 'rolled back' to
> the previous versions - which I have now installed. Running
>
> library(SASmixed)
> data(Demand)
> example(Demand)
>
> gives
>
>
> Demand> fm1Demand <- lmer(log(d) ~ log(y) + log(r
John Logsdon wrote:
> I've just hit this problem as well and as I am slumming it on XP at the
> moment, I don't have the compilation tools to use the .tar.gz version.
So please follow that thread and note that people were already working
on it for you during the whole weekend!
In this case, it d
On 1/22/06, John Logsdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just hit this problem as well and as I am slumming it on XP at the
> moment, I don't have the compilation tools to use the .tar.gz version.
>
> I also notice that the numbering format has changed. Is this intentional?
Which numbering form
Doug and list
No, the change as reported on my XP PC was Matrix package 0.995-1 was
found but lme4 requires >= 0.995.2.
The format change was from a dash to a dot.
Maybe a few more would spell SOS!
But it's the sort of thing where sometimes even the geniuses very close to
the work may read th
John Logsdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doug and list
>
> No, the change as reported on my XP PC was Matrix package 0.995-1 was
> found but lme4 requires >= 0.995.2.
>
> The format change was from a dash to a dot.
As far as I remember, the version comparison logic is
separator-agnostic, so
13 matches
Mail list logo
