ge-
From: Uwe Ligges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 6:18 PM
To: Crispin Miller
Cc: R-help (E-mail)
Subject: Re: FW: [R] Optimising code
Crispin Miller wrote:
>>>I have a function that applies a wilcoxon test to 12 sets of about a
>>>quarter of a
Yup, my mistake for not being very clear! Alas the computer is already very fast -
looks like it's C for me...
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Burns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 October 2003 12:00
> Cc: Crispin Miller
> Subject: Re: FW: [R] Optimisin
Crispin Miller wrote:
I have a function that applies a wilcoxon test to 12 sets of about a quarter of a million pairs
... and let me guess: everything is significiant to an almost arbitrary
value of \alpha?
:-) For each of quarter of a million sets, I do a wilcoxon between two pairs each
con
>> I have a function that applies a wilcoxon test to 12 sets of about a quarter of a
>> million pairs
> ... and let me guess: everything is significiant to an almost arbitrary
> value of \alpha?
:-) For each of quarter of a million sets, I do a wilcoxon between two pairs each
containing twent
Crispin Miller wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any advice on speeding up R functions (short of re-implementing them
in C :-) )?
Some strategies are in every good book on S/R.
I have a function that applies a wilcoxon test to 12 sets of about a quarter of a million pairs
... and let me guess: everyt
Hi,
Does anyone have any advice on speeding up R functions (short of re-implementing them
in C :-) )?
I have a function that applies a wilcoxon test to 12 sets of about a quarter of a
million pairs (and takes about 3 hours). I've replaced the inner loop I had originally
with a function call via
