David Brahm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Language differences:
> - Scoping rules differ. In R, functions see the functions they're in. Try:
> f1 <- function() {x <- 1; f2 <- function() print(x); f2()}; f1()
It may be more accurate to say "the functions they're defined in".
It's lexical s
Purvis Bedenbaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I started looking for an R-S compatibility table but didn't find it.
> Examples:
> 'stdev' is now 'sd' - is it exactly the same computation ?
> couldn't find a built-in for error.bar()
> syntax that is an error in R: param(thisframe,"b") <- valu
> "Purvis" == Purvis Bedenbaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 20 Oct 2003 08:03:13 -0400 writes:
Purvis> Hello all - I've just recently been exploring R for
Purvis> the first time. After noticing a few things that
Purvis> have changed from S to R, I started looking for an
One comment: the first two of those are not in S, but rather in S-PLUS.
So a big question is compatibility with what? (There are quite large
compatibility differences between versions of S-PLUS too.)
There are comments on differences in the FAQ, but they are not
comprehensive.
On Mon, 20 Oct 2
Hello all - I've just recently been exploring R for the
first time. After noticing a few things that have changed
from S to R, I started looking for an R-S compatibility table
but didn't find it. Is such a table out there ? Where ?
Thanks much,
Purvis Bedenbaugh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Examples:
'std
