Of course it should be in ESS. In fact, it is for me, anyway
(different colors depending on whether they match or not).
Check out the paren-hilit or paren-match (or something like that)
customize options.
I.e.
M-x customize-groups paren
(which ought to complete on names of groups/options st
If you are running R in the *R* buffer inside emacs, then you automatically
have highlighting of mismatched parentheses and brackets.
Rich
__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting g
> well ESS has such a facility.
>
> However, I think Mathematica has a super scheme: unbalanced brackets
> show up
> in red, making them obvious.
>
> This is particularly good for spotting wrongly interleaved brackets, as
> in
>
> ([ blah di blah )]
>
>
>
> in which case both opening brac
Hi Ajay
well ESS has such a facility.
However, I think Mathematica has a super scheme: unbalanced brackets
show up
in red, making them obvious.
This is particularly good for spotting wrongly interleaved brackets, as
in
([ blah di blah )]
in which case both opening braces are highligh
I am using R 2.1 on Apple OS X.
When I get the ">" prompt, I find it works well with emacs commandline
editing. Keys like M-f C-k etc. work fine.
The one thing that I really yearn for, which is missing, is bracket
matching When I am doing something which ends in it is really
useful to have e
