Kjetil Halvorsen writes:
>
> Another possibi8lity, of course, is language-based lists. Any interest for
> r-spanish@ ...?
>
> Kjetil
Since you´ve mentioned the topic, anyone reading this thread
knows of currently active R language-based lists? I am a member of R_STAT,
an R list for
On 1/5/06, John Maindonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've changed the heading because this really is another thread. I
> think it inevitable that there will, in the course of time, be other
> lists that are devoted, in some shape or form, to the concerns of
> practitioners (at all levels) who
I don't think splitting the list is a good idea, neither according to the
level of questions (which will "kill" the "beginners list"), nor according
to geographic boundaries.
I totally agree with Heinz Tuechler's position : a (short) code on the
sublect of the e-mail seems a good ideau if people f
At 11:56 05.01.2006 +1100, John Maindonald wrote:
>I've changed the heading because this really is another thread. I
>think it inevitable that there will, in the course of time, be other
>lists that are devoted, in some shape or form, to the concerns of
>practitioners (at all levels) who are
I've changed the heading because this really is another thread. I
think it inevitable that there will, in the course of time, be other
lists that are devoted, in some shape or form, to the concerns of
practitioners (at all levels) who are using R. One development I'd
not like to see is fr
