"Marc R. Feldesman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 12:28 PM 3/17/2004, Ed L Cashin wrote:
>
> I hope this response isn't indicative of the speed with which gmane
> posts messages. I think this entire thread was more than 7 or 8
> months ago, possibly longer.
Your hopes are fulfilled. The reas
At 12:28 PM 3/17/2004, Ed L Cashin wrote:
I hope this response isn't indicative of the speed with which gmane posts
messages. I think this entire thread was more than 7 or 8 months ago,
possibly longer.
>"Roger D. Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Marc R. Feldesman wrote:
>>
>>> I agree w
"Roger D. Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marc R. Feldesman wrote:
>
>> I agree with you on the "flood" of messages lately. Often this
>> flood accompanies a new release, but this flood has continued
>> unabated for longer than I would have imagined. The good news is
>> that R is becoming mo
Actually, check the archives about a year ago when this was brought up and the
associated
problems. Ranging from spam harvesters, copyright and the like.
Best, MEH
--
Mark Hall
Niigata Prefectural Museum of History
<>
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
Marc R. Feldesman wrote:
I agree with you on the "flood" of messages lately. Often this flood
accompanies a new release, but this flood has continued unabated for
longer than I would have imagined. The good news is that R is becoming
more popular and this (hopefully) attracts more developers,
"Mike Prager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am finding that the flood of R email messages is becoming difficult
> to deal with, even using filters, etc., in my email client. Would we
> be better served by establishing a Usenet newsgroup? Would that be
> practical or impractical? Would it crea
At 07:17 AM 5/30/2003, Mike Prager wrote:
>I probably shouldn't suggest this, because I can't volunteer to implement
>it. However, I bring it up in the hopes that if (1) others agree and (2)
>the R core group think it a good idea that a suitable volunteer will come
>forward.
>
>I am finding that t
I probably shouldn't suggest this, because I can't volunteer to implement
it. However, I bring it up in the hopes that if (1) others agree and (2)
the R core group think it a good idea that a suitable volunteer will come
forward.
I am finding that the flood of R email messages is becoming diff
