Re: [R] alternative to 'groups' for lattice bwplot()

2005-03-23 Thread Sebastian Luque
Mulholland, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm afraid you have lost me. What is it that you want that reordering the formula does not achieve. bwplot(yield ~ year | site, data = barley) has sites next to each other. Yes, they are next to each other, but in different panels, as expected when

Re: [R] alternative to 'groups' for lattice bwplot()

2005-03-23 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 00:10, Sebastian Luque wrote: Hi, Is there some alternative to the 'groups' argument in lattice's bwplot function for boxplots? Say in the example below: bwplot(yield ~ site | year, data = barley) you want to have two side by side boxplots per site, corresponding

[R] alternative to 'groups' for lattice bwplot()

2005-03-22 Thread Sebastian Luque
Hi, Is there some alternative to the 'groups' argument in lattice's bwplot function for boxplots? Say in the example below: bwplot(yield ~ site | year, data = barley) you want to have two side by side boxplots per site, corresponding to each year in the barley data frame. Ideally, the space

RE: [R] alternative to 'groups' for lattice bwplot()

2005-03-22 Thread Mulholland, Tom
) then I guess you might find writing your own code easier than forcing lattice to be something other than itself. -Original Message- From: Sebastian Luque [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 23 March 2005 2:11 PM To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: [R] alternative to 'groups